KOLD vs. YANG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG).

KOLD and YANG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KOLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex (TR) (200%). It was launched on Oct 4, 2011. YANG is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). It was launched on Dec 3, 2009. Both KOLD and YANG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KOLD vs. YANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KOLD vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas	-35.24%	-17.48%	-11.34%	249.82%	-88.62%	-74.44%	22.05%	82.94%	-46.48%	72.02%
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares	20.02%	-62.77%	-71.41%	11.95%	-41.34%	25.90%	-58.66%	-40.72%	13.14%	-64.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOLD achieves a -35.24% return, which is significantly lower than YANG's 20.02% return. Over the past 10 years, KOLD has outperformed YANG with an annualized return of -28.67%, while YANG has yielded a comparatively lower -39.11% annualized return.

KOLD

• 1D: 5.20%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: -35.24%
• 6M: -28.13%
• 1Y: 7.53%
• 3Y*: -14.24%
• 5Y*: -43.16%
• 10Y*: -28.67%

YANG

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: 9.80%
• YTD: 20.02%
• 6M: 44.40%
• 1Y: -22.06%
• 3Y*: -43.56%
• 5Y*: -33.55%
• 10Y*: -39.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOLD vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.

YANG

Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares

KOLD

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas

Return for Risk

KOLD vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOLD

KOLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
KOLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
KOLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
KOLD Omega Ratio Rank: 29
KOLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
KOLD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

YANG

YANG Risk / Return Rank: 8
YANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
YANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
YANG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
YANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
YANG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOLD vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KOLD	YANG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	-0.31	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	0.01	+0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.00	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	-0.32	+0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.53	-0.38	+0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KOLD vs. YANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the YANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOLD and YANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOLD	YANG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	-0.31	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	-0.36	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	-0.48	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.49	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between KOLD and YANG is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KOLD vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison

KOLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares	3.40%	4.03%	9.42%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	1.54%	0.56%

Drawdowns

KOLD vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOLD drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum YANG drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOLD and YANG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOLD	YANG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-99.98%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.50%	-68.02%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.91%	-97.38%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.45%	-99.60%	+0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.35%	-99.97%	+2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.16%	-90.42%	+21.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.34%	57.00%	-25.66%

Volatility

KOLD vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) has a higher volatility of 29.15% compared to Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) at 19.60%. This indicates that KOLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOLD	YANG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.15%	19.60%	+9.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.32%	43.29%	+58.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	120.69%	71.59%	+49.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.51%	94.39%	+24.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.90%	82.22%	+19.68%