PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOD.L vs. BME.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L) and B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOD.L achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than BME.L's 23.34% return. Over the past 10 years, KOD.L has outperformed BME.L with an annualized return of 21.98%, while BME.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


KOD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-6.06%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
-21.67%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
21.98%

BME.L

1D
6.55%
1M
19.38%
YTD
23.34%
6M
24.86%
1Y
-21.90%
3Y*
-21.75%
5Y*
-11.06%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KOD.L
Kodal Minerals plc
-6.06%-27.47%22.97%37.04%-12.20%192.86%147.06%-66.67%-34.62%11.43%
BME.L
B&M European Value Retail SA
23.34%-48.93%-29.37%46.22%-32.26%36.96%36.07%48.71%-32.24%55.09%

Correlation

The correlation between KOD.L and BME.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.02

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

KOD.L:

£0.00

BME.L:

£11.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KOD.L:

-£29.81K

BME.L:

£3.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

KOD.L:

£25.53M

BME.L:

£1.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOD.L vs. BME.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOD.L
KOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
KOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BME.L
BME.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L) and B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOD.LBME.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.95

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.49

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

-0.68

+1.19

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the BME.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOD.L and BME.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOD.LBME.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

-0.48

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.32

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.07

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.08

-0.15

Drawdowns

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than BME.L's maximum drawdown of -70.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOD.L and BME.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOD.LBME.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-70.05%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.43%

-45.55%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.47%

-70.05%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.37%

-70.05%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.12%

-70.05%

-25.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.19%

-59.30%

-28.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.53%

-17.83%

-71.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.00%

32.39%

-6.39%

Volatility

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kodal Minerals plc (KOD.L) is 10.96%, while B&M European Value Retail SA (BME.L) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that KOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BME.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOD.LBME.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

17.69%

-6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.98%

31.39%

+22.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.83%

48.69%

+30.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.61%

34.34%

+45.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.59%

31.03%

+77.56%

Dividends

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Dividend Comparison

KOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BME.L
B&M European Value Retail SA
6.34%16.71%9.51%6.19%4.01%9.94%4.78%1.86%2.66%1.49%5.43%1.44%
KOD.L
Kodal Minerals plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KOD.L vs. BME.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodal Minerals plc and B&M European Value Retail SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B202220232024202520260
3.03B
(KOD.L) Total Revenue
(BME.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KOD.L and BME.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOD.L and BME.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer