KOCT vs. TMAR
KOCT (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October) and TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds - KOCT tracks the Russell 2000 Price Return Index while TMAR tracks the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KOCT returned 22.22% vs 28.83% for TMAR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TMAR.
Performance
KOCT vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOCT achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 14.45% return.
KOCT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- —
TMAR
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOCT vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 8.72% | 12.20% |
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 14.45% | 14.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOCT and TMAR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between KOCT and TMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOCT vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank
KOCT
TMAR
KOCT vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KOCT | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.77 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 7.95 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 38.42 | -22.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KOCT | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 3.06 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.25 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
KOCT vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOCT drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, which is greater than TMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOCT and TMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOCT | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -9.93% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -3.64% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.72% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -0.66% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 0.75% | +0.64% |
Volatility
KOCT vs. TMAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) is 2.15%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that KOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOCT | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 4.53% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 8.17% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 9.47% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 11.42% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 11.42% | +3.18% |
KOCT vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOCT vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither KOCT nor TMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.79% |
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOCT and TMAR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMAR has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to KOCT (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOCT dropped -28.22% vs TMAR's -9.93%.
On 1-year performance, TMAR leads with 28.83% vs 22.22% for KOCT. On fees, KOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMAR has performed better with a 28.83% return vs 22.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.
KOCT and TMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KOCT tracks Russell 2000 Price Return Index, while TMAR tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOCT and 0.95% for TMAR.
TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOCT and TMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer