PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOCT vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOCT vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOCT achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's 5.60% return.


KOCT

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.07%
6M
9.29%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.30%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOCT vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KOCT
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October
10.07%10.14%6.87%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
5.60%12.92%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between KOCT and BUFP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024

0.75

The correlation between KOCT and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOCT vs. BUFP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOCT
BUFP

Technology

19.1%
38.4%

Industrials

17.9%
7.9%

Healthcare

16.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

15.5%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
10.0%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.8%

Energy

5.5%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.7%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.6%

Technology

KOCT
19.1%
BUFP
38.4%

Industrials

KOCT
17.9%
BUFP
7.9%

Healthcare

KOCT
16.2%
BUFP
8.4%

Financial Services

KOCT
15.5%
BUFP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KOCT
8.0%
BUFP
10.0%

Real Estate

KOCT
5.9%
BUFP
1.8%

Energy

KOCT
5.5%
BUFP
3.2%

Basic Materials

KOCT
4.6%
BUFP
1.7%

Utilities

KOCT
2.8%
BUFP
2.1%

Communication Services

KOCT
2.4%
BUFP
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

KOCT
2.3%
BUFP
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOCT vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOCT
KOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
KOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOCT vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOCTBUFPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.58

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

19.56

-2.93

KOCT vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOCT and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOCT vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOCT drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOCT and BUFP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOCTBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-11.98%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-4.41%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.87%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-0.99%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.80%

+0.58%

Volatility

KOCT vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) have volatilities of 2.11% and 2.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOCTBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

2.12%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

5.16%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

6.43%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.28%

9.47%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

9.47%

+5.10%

KOCT vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOCT vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

KOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KOCT
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOCT and BUFP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFP has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to KOCT (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOCT dropped -28.22% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

On 1-year performance, KOCT leads with 22.84% vs 15.71% for BUFP. On fees, BUFP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KOCT has performed better with a 22.84% return vs 15.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUFP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KOCT.

BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for KOCT.

KOCT tracks Russell 2000 Price Return Index, while BUFP tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOCT and 0.50% for BUFP.

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOCT and BUFP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer