PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNOV vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KNOV vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KNOV vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KNOV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November
1.21%11.91%1.18%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
-2.14%14.01%2.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNOV achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's -2.14% return.


KNOV

1D
0.52%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
1.21%
6M
4.10%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
0.24%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
1.02%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KNOV vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KNOV vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNOV
KNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNOV vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNOVFBUFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.87

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.13

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.05

9.09

-0.04

KNOV vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNOV and FBUF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNOVFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.12

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between KNOV and FBUF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KNOV vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

KNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


Drawdowns

KNOV vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNOV and FBUF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KNOVFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-11.09%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-6.81%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-3.96%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-1.43%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.60%

+0.43%

Volatility

KNOV vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 3.08%. This indicates that KNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KNOVFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.08%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

6.52%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

10.76%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

9.86%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

9.86%

+3.46%