KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO
KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 34.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.44% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGG.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGG.TO
XEQT.TO
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGG.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.91 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGG.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -29.74% | +28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | 0.00% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -4.19% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGG.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 11.98% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 13.07% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 15.62% | -5.77% |
Dividends
KNGG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.57% | 1.66% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.19% |