KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO
KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and VVO.TO (Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Global Equities funds. KNGG.TO is actively managed, while VVO.TO is passively managed. At 0.25, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVO.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.44% |
VVO.TO Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGG.TO and VVO.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGG.TO
VVO.TO
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF (VVO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGG.TO | VVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.57 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum VVO.TO drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and VVO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGG.TO | VVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -33.20% | +31.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -3.81% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -3.47% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGG.TO | VVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 8.62% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 9.83% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 12.14% | -2.29% |
Dividends
KNGG.TO vs. VVO.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VVO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VVO.TO Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.07% | 2.13% | 2.05% | 2.68% | 1.55% | 2.30% | 2.23% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 0.71% |