KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO
KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At -0.27, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.44% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGG.TO and TINF.TO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management — when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGG.TO
TINF.TO
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGG.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.05 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum TINF.TO drawdown of -13.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and TINF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGG.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -13.48% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.50% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -2.41% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGG.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 9.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 11.64% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 11.93% | -2.08% |
Dividends
KNGG.TO vs. TINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.60% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% |