KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and TEQT.TO (TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. KNGG.TO is actively managed, while TEQT.TO is passively managed. At 0.49, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KNGG.TO

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 5.72%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.44%
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio	5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and TEQT.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNGG.TO	TEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	2.72	-1.09

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum TEQT.TO drawdown of -7.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and TEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNGG.TO	TEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-7.62%	+6.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-1.09%	+0.65%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KNGG.TO	TEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.85%	12.47%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	12.47%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.85%	12.47%	-2.62%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.

	TTM	2025
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio	1.40%	1.14%