PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMVAX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KMVAX having a 12.97% return and DNLDX slightly higher at 13.01%. Over the past 10 years, KMVAX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 11.68%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


KMVAX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.67%
YTD
12.97%
6M
13.81%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
11.68%

DNLDX

1D
-0.50%
1M
5.17%
YTD
13.01%
6M
13.05%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
12.97%14.44%27.82%20.42%-16.01%28.83%2.96%27.03%-19.72%16.12%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.01%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between KMVAX and DNLDX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1998

0.90

The correlation between KMVAX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMVAX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMVAX
KMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMVAXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.13

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

11.71

-6.29

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMVAX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMVAX drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, roughly equal to the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMVAX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMVAXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-63.69%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-7.29%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.26%

-20.42%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-23.42%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.41%

-42.23%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.50%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

-9.63%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

1.95%

+1.82%

Volatility

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 4.25%. This indicates that KMVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMVAXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

4.25%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

10.00%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

13.45%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

18.54%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

19.54%

+0.63%

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMVAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMVAX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

KMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than DNLDX's 13.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.29%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
4.69%5.30%7.58%3.35%3.57%3.72%1.35%2.11%9.38%6.87%5.64%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMVAX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMVAX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to DNLDX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMVAX dropped -65.81% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMVAX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer