KMVAX vs. ATGAX
KMVAX (Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KMVAX charges 1.45%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KMVAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KMVAX Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund | -0.15% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMVAX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMVAX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
KMVAX
ATGAX
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMVAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMVAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 58.33 | -57.91 |
Drawdowns
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMVAX drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMVAX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMVAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | 0.00% | -65.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | 0.00% | -9.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | — | — |
Volatility
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMVAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 9.26% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 9.26% | +9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 9.26% | +10.88% |
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMVAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMVAX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
KMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMVAX Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund | 4.64% | 5.30% | 7.58% | 3.35% | 3.57% | 3.72% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 9.38% | 6.87% | 5.64% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, KMVAX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for KMVAX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer