PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMTUY vs. KUBTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Komatsu Ltd. (KMTUY) and Kubota Corp ADR (KUBTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMTUY achieves a 34.31% return, which is significantly higher than KUBTY's 23.09% return. Over the past 10 years, KMTUY has outperformed KUBTY with an annualized return of 8.60%, while KUBTY has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


KMTUY

1D
-1.67%
1M
8.90%
6M
5.06%
YTD
34.31%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
8.60%
ALL TIME*
2.88%

KUBTY

1D
0.82%
1M
2.59%
6M
12.36%
YTD
23.09%
1Y
51.59%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-2.77%
10Y*
2.40%
ALL TIME*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.37M$4.43M$6.31M
$1.37M$2.20M$2.01M

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMTUY
Komatsu Ltd.
34.31%19.17%7.41%20.24%-7.62%-15.58%15.15%11.61%-40.55%61.31%
KUBTY
Kubota Corp ADR
23.09%23.00%-21.68%9.84%-38.98%1.25%39.67%12.14%-28.61%38.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KMTUY and KUBTY is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.53

The correlation between KMTUY and KUBTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMTUY:

$38.02B

KUBTY:

$19.64B

EPS

KMTUY:

¥428.87

KUBTY:

¥974.71

PE Ratio

KMTUY:

15.66

KUBTY:

13.93

PEG Ratio

KMTUY:

0.87

KUBTY:

1.95

PS Ratio

KMTUY:

1.40

KUBTY:

0.98

PB Ratio

KMTUY:

1.72

KUBTY:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMTUY:

¥4.34T

KUBTY:

¥3.16T

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMTUY:

¥1.32T

KUBTY:

¥935.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMTUY:

¥774.33B

KUBTY:

¥454.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Komatsu Ltd.

Kubota Corp ADR

Often compared with KMTUY:
KMTUY vs. CATKMTUY vs. IVVKMTUY vs. VOO
Often compared with KUBTY:
KUBTY vs. ^GSPCKUBTY vs. MIELY

Return for Risk

KMTUY vs. KUBTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KMTUY
KMTUY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KMTUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMTUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMTUY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
KMTUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMTUY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KUBTY
KUBTY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
KUBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KUBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
KUBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
KUBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
KUBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Komatsu Ltd. (KMTUY) and Kubota Corp ADR (KUBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMTUYKUBTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.84

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

3.85

-1.62

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMTUY Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the KUBTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMTUY and KUBTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMTUY drawdown since its inception was -75.37%, which is greater than KUBTY's maximum drawdown of -57.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMTUY and KUBTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMTUYKUBTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.37%

-57.35%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.52%

-28.22%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

-36.44%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-54.24%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.68%

-57.35%

-7.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.53%

-28.64%

+12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.40%

-24.43%

-7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.13%

13.43%

+0.70%

Volatility

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Volatility Comparison

Komatsu Ltd. (KMTUY) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to Kubota Corp ADR (KUBTY) at 8.90%. This indicates that KMTUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KUBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMTUYKUBTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.09%

8.90%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.85%

31.29%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.31%

39.08%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

30.81%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

29.23%

+0.96%

Dividends

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Dividend Comparison

Neither KMTUY nor KUBTY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMTUY
Komatsu Ltd.
0.00%2.31%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.72%2.32%2.88%
KUBTY
Kubota Corp ADR
0.00%1.21%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.97%2.37%

Financials

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Komatsu Ltd. and Kubota Corp ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KMTUY vs. KUBTY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Komatsu Ltd. and Kubota Corp ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KMTUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Komatsu Ltd. reported a gross profit of 338.53B and revenue of 1.06T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.0%.

KUBTY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kubota Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 260.92B and revenue of 824.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.

KMTUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Komatsu Ltd. reported an operating income of 152.80B and revenue of 1.06T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

KUBTY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kubota Corp ADR reported an operating income of 101.25B and revenue of 824.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

KMTUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Komatsu Ltd. reported a net income of 97.42B and revenue of 1.06T, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

KUBTY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kubota Corp ADR reported a net income of 74.63B and revenue of 824.89B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMTUY and KUBTY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMTUY has higher volatility (11.09%) compared to KUBTY (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMTUY dropped -75.37% vs KUBTY's -57.35%.

KUBTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMTUY and KUBTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer