KMLM vs. IWVL.L
KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index, while IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KMLM returned 4.11%/yr vs 16.13%/yr for IWVL.L. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. KMLM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 32.97% return.
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 13.24%
- 3Y*
- -1.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 32.97%
- 6M
- 35.11%
- 1Y
- 63.09%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.32% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 32.97% | 40.42% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMLM and IWVL.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.06 |
The correlation between KMLM and IWVL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (5 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMLM vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
KMLM
IWVL.L
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMLM | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.68 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 7.10 | -5.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 25.90 | -20.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and IWVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMLM | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -39.30% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -8.74% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -14.46% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -26.55% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.54% | -1.88% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -7.48% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.40% | -0.30% |
Volatility
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is 3.35%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that KMLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMLM | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 6.99% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 13.69% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 16.20% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 16.15% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 17.05% | -2.34% |
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMLM vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while IWVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.64% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMLM and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM is categorized as Systematic Trend, while IWVL.L is Global Equities. KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for KMLM and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for KMLM and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer