KMLM vs. BRK-B
KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, KMLM returned 4.11%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for BRK-B. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.67% return.
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 13.24%
- 3Y*
- -1.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.32% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.67% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMLM and BRK-B is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMLM vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
KMLM
BRK-B
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMLM | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | -0.02 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | -0.05 | +5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMLM | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -53.86% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -9.42% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -14.95% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -26.58% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.54% | -9.36% | -6.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -11.07% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 4.53% | -2.43% |
Volatility
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is 3.35%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that KMLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMLM | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 3.95% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 10.78% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 14.38% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 17.12% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 19.44% | -4.73% |
Dividends
KMLM vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.64% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMLM and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRK-B has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to KMLM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLM dropped -27.47% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMLM and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer