KMID vs. PCLO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KMID returned -0.30% vs 5.15% for PCLO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KMID charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PCLO.

Performance

KMID vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMID achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than PCLO's 2.09% return.

KMID

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: -0.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCLO

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMID vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.87%	0.31%	-6.68%
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	2.09%	5.39%	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between KMID and PCLO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.09

The correlation between KMID and PCLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KMID vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 8
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PCLO

PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMID vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMID	PCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	5.72	-5.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	9.91	-9.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	2.65	-1.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	19.72	-19.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	114.96	-115.03

KMID vs. PCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMID Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the PCLO Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMID and PCLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KMID vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMID drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than PCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMID and PCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMID	PCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-0.76%	-18.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-0.26%	-10.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-0.08%	-6.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-0.03%	-5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	0.04%	+4.32%

Volatility

KMID vs. PCLO - Volatility Comparison

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) at 0.23%. This indicates that KMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMID	PCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	0.23%	+4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	0.70%	+11.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.88%	0.91%	+13.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	1.14%	+15.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	1.14%	+15.85%

KMID vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMID has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMID vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison

KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than PCLO's 5.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.12%	0.06%	0.05%
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	5.25%	5.53%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMID and PCLO in my portfolio?

KMID and PCLO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMID or PCLO?

KMID has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to PCLO (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMID dropped -18.89% vs PCLO's -0.76%.

Which ETF is better, KMID or PCLO?

On 1-year performance, PCLO leads with 5.15% vs -0.30% for KMID. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KMID or PCLO?

Over the 1-year period, PCLO has performed better with a 5.15% return vs -0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMID or PCLO?

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMID or PCLO?

PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 0.12% for KMID.

What is the main difference between KMID and PCLO?

KMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PCLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for KMID and 0.29% for PCLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.72 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.