KMAR vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Price Return, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KMAR returned 21.69% vs 64.61% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. KMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

KMAR vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMAR achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

KMAR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 8.88%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMAR vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	11.95%	11.45%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KMAR and BITI is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	-0.50

Return for Risk

KMAR vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 91
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMAR vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMAR	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.47	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	2.04	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	2.57	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.29	6.38	+11.91

KMAR vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMAR and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KMAR vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMAR drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMAR and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMAR	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.32%	-92.16%	+80.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.89%	-25.28%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-86.41%	+86.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-68.40%	+67.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	10.16%	-8.97%

Volatility

KMAR vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) is 1.60%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that KMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMAR	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.60%	10.76%	-9.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	34.28%	-27.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.22%	44.15%	-34.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.92%	52.24%	-40.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.92%	52.24%	-40.32%

KMAR vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMAR vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

KMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMAR and BITI in my portfolio?

KMAR and BITI have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMAR or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to KMAR (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMAR dropped -11.32% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, KMAR or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs 21.69% for KMAR. On fees, KMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KMAR or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs 21.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMAR or BITI?

KMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMAR or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.00% for KMAR.

What is the main difference between KMAR and BITI?

KMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. KMAR tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Price Return, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KMAR and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.