KMAR vs. APXM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. KMAR is passively managed, while APXM is actively managed. Over the past year, KMAR returned 23.24% vs 5.49% for APXM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.

Performance

KMAR vs. APXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMAR achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 2.11% return.

KMAR

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 23.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APXM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMAR vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	9.54%	21.74%
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	2.11%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between KMAR and APXM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025	0.62

The correlation between KMAR and APXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KMAR vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 83
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

APXM

APXM Risk / Return Rank: 99
APXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
APXM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
APXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
APXM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMAR vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KMAR	APXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	5.47	-2.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	10.56	-6.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.60	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	20.36	-15.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.58	110.99	-91.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KMAR vs. APXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is lower than the APXM Sharpe Ratio of 5.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMAR and APXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KMAR	APXM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	5.47	-2.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	5.70	-4.12

Drawdowns

KMAR vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMAR drawdown since its inception was -10.06%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMAR and APXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMAR	APXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.06%	-0.40%	-9.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.89%	-0.27%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.06%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-0.03%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	0.05%	+1.14%

Volatility

KMAR vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) at 0.42%. This indicates that KMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMAR	APXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	0.42%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.32%	0.78%	+5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.32%	1.01%	+8.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.08%	1.20%	+10.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.08%	1.20%	+10.88%

KMAR vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMAR vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison

Neither KMAR nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMAR and APXM in my portfolio?

KMAR and APXM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMAR or APXM?

KMAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to APXM (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMAR dropped -10.06% vs APXM's -0.40%.

Which ETF is better, KMAR or APXM?

On 1-year performance, KMAR leads with 23.24% vs 5.49% for APXM. On fees, KMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KMAR or APXM?

Over the 1-year period, KMAR has performed better with a 23.24% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMAR or APXM?

KMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMAR or APXM?

KMAR and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KMAR and APXM?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KMAR and 0.85% for APXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.