PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMT vs. TLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMT vs. TLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMT achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than TLTD's 8.45% return.


KLMT

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.23%
YTD
12.04%
6M
12.88%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTD

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.45%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMT vs. TLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KLMT and TLTD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024

0.80

The correlation between KLMT and TLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

KLMT vs. TLTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KLMT
TLTD

Technology

30.0%
10.3%

Financial Services

16.9%
32.7%

Industrials

10.2%
13.5%

Communication Services

9.6%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.6%

Healthcare

8.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.5%

Energy

4.1%
7.7%

Basic Materials

2.8%
7.4%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.9%

Utilities

2.0%
3.3%

Technology

KLMT
30.0%
TLTD
10.3%

Financial Services

KLMT
16.9%
TLTD
32.7%

Industrials

KLMT
10.2%
TLTD
13.5%

Communication Services

KLMT
9.6%
TLTD
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KLMT
9.2%
TLTD
5.6%

Healthcare

KLMT
8.0%
TLTD
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

KLMT
4.6%
TLTD
3.5%

Energy

KLMT
4.1%
TLTD
7.7%

Basic Materials

KLMT
2.8%
TLTD
7.4%

Real Estate

KLMT
2.7%
TLTD
0.9%

Utilities

KLMT
2.0%
TLTD
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMT vs. TLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMT
KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMT vs. TLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLMTTLTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.21

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

8.49

+4.26

KLMT vs. TLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the TLTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMT and TLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMTTLTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.86

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.52

+0.76

Drawdowns

KLMT vs. TLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum TLTD drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and TLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMTTLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-40.62%

+23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-12.11%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.35%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-7.68%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.15%

-0.96%

Volatility

KLMT vs. TLTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is 3.76%, while FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that KLMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMTTLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.34%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

11.99%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

14.46%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.97%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

16.81%

-0.96%

KLMT vs. TLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMT vs. TLTD - Dividend Comparison

KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than TLTD's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
1.75%1.95%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.08%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMT and TLTD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTD has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to KLMT (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLMT dropped -16.87% vs TLTD's -40.62%.

On 1-year performance, KLMT leads with 27.86% vs 26.70% for TLTD. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, KLMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KLMT has performed better with a 27.86% return vs 26.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.75% for KLMT.

KLMT tracks MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index, while TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for KLMT and 0.39% for TLTD.

KLMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMT and TLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer