PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMT vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
-1.54%21.31%4.94%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
10.67%43.11%-8.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMT achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 10.67% return.


KLMT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
0.14%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
10.67%
6M
19.22%
1Y
102.27%
3Y*
35.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLMT vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

KLMT vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMT
KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLMTSOXQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

2.06

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.67

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

4.80

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.52

17.46

-9.94

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMT and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMTSOXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.06

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.60

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between KLMT and SOXQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than SOXQ's 0.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
1.99%1.95%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.46%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Drawdowns

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and SOXQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMTSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-46.01%

+29.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-15.59%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-7.44%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-13.37%

+11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

4.80%

-2.14%

Volatility

KLMT vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is 6.06%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that KLMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KLMTSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

12.56%

-6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

26.26%

-16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

40.14%

-22.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

36.09%

-20.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

36.09%

-20.08%