PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMT vs. PJBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMT vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KLMT

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.17%
6M
9.69%
YTD
11.81%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJBF

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMT vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


KLMT vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KLMT
PJBF

Technology

25.2%
40.0%

Financial Services

8.6%
2.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
11.5%

Healthcare

6.3%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
13.8%

Industrials

5.6%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
2.3%

Energy

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Utilities

0.9%
2.0%

Technology

KLMT
25.2%
PJBF
40.0%

Financial Services

KLMT
8.6%
PJBF
2.5%

Communication Services

KLMT
6.6%
PJBF
11.5%

Healthcare

KLMT
6.3%
PJBF
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

KLMT
6.3%
PJBF
13.8%

Industrials

KLMT
5.6%
PJBF
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

KLMT
3.4%
PJBF
2.3%

Energy

KLMT
2.3%
PJBF

-

Basic Materials

KLMT
1.9%
PJBF

-

Real Estate

KLMT
1.5%
PJBF

-

Utilities

KLMT
0.9%
PJBF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMT vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMT
KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMT vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLMTPJBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

KLMT vs. PJBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLMT vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and PJBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMTPJBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

0.00%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

0.00%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

Volatility

KLMT vs. PJBF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMTPJBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

0.00%

+13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

0.00%

+15.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

0.00%

+15.90%

KLMT vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMT vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
1.76%1.95%0.85%
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for KLMT and 0.59% for PJBF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMT and PJBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer