PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMT.DE achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than IBCQ.DE's -0.59% return.


KLMT.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.69%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
0.08%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.23%

IBCQ.DE

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-0.83%
YTD
-0.59%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
0.30%
ALL TIME*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLMT.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.08%-0.22%3.20%6.84%-18.17%-1.90%3.12%8.93%1.08%-2.48%
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.59%4.51%1.64%6.18%-16.03%-2.10%5.98%9.58%-4.23%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2017

0.60

The correlation between KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMT.DE
KLMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
KLMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCQ.DE
IBCQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLMT.DEIBCQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.06

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.43

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

1.33

-0.64

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is comparable to the IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCQ.DE drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMT.DEIBCQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.02%

-21.76%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-3.27%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.58%

-4.75%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.35%

-21.65%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.37%

-8.08%

-4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-5.41%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.06%

+0.18%

Volatility

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE) have volatilities of 0.92% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMT.DEIBCQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

4.65%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

5.45%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

6.13%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

5.85%

+0.09%

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KLMT.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

KLMT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBCQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.15%3.96%3.75%3.20%2.62%2.09%2.36%2.66%3.00%2.19%2.51%2.75%
KLMT.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

KLMT.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond, while IBCQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMT.DE and IBCQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer