KLMN vs. CVSE
KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) and CVSE (Calvert US Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KLMN is passively managed, while CVSE is actively managed. Over the past year, KLMN returned 27.74% vs 8.06% for CVSE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KLMN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CVSE.
Performance
KLMN vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KLMN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLMN vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 10.80% | 18.24% | -3.62% |
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.00% | 10.14% | -4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMN and CVSE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KLMN and CVSE has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMN vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank
KLMN
CVSE
KLMN vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLMN | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.66 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.14 | 5.71 | +8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLMN | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.28 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.92 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
KLMN vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum CVSE drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMN and CVSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMN | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -20.29% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -3.08% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.68% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -2.69% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.42% | +0.55% |
Volatility
KLMN vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that KLMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMN | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 0.00% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 0.00% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 6.49% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 13.87% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 13.87% | +3.74% |
KLMN vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLMN vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison
KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than CVSE's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.81% | 1.05% | 1.22% |
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 1.28% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLMN and CVSE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLMN has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to CVSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLMN dropped -19.16% vs CVSE's -20.29%.
On 1-year performance, KLMN leads with 27.74% vs 8.06% for CVSE. On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CVSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KLMN has performed better with a 27.74% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CVSE.
KLMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.59% for CVSE.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KLMN and 0.29% for CVSE.
KLMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLMN and CVSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer