KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE
KLMH.DE (Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMH.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KLMH.DE returned 1.19% vs 26.01% for WEBN.DE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLMH.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBN.DE.
Performance
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMH.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 13.12% return.
KLMH.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KLMH.DE Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.95% | 1.14% | 2.26% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.12% | 9.70% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMH.DE and WEBN.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
KLMH.DE
WEBN.DE
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLMH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.65 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 2.96 | -2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMH.DE and WEBN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.67% | -21.22% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -15.77% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.52% | -1.26% | -13.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -5.99% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 8.78% | -7.55% |
Volatility
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) is 1.11%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that KLMH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 3.70% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.04% | 8.93% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 24.35% | -19.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 21.22% | -15.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 21.22% | -15.76% |
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLMH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither KLMH.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLMH.DE and WEBN.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMH.DE.
KLMH.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while WEBN.DE is Global Equities. KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMH.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
Find the right allocation for KLMH.DE and WEBN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer