PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLGAX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLGAX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.18% return. Over the past 10 years, KLGAX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 13.70%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.


KLGAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
13.70%

CHASX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.08%
YTD
24.18%
6M
22.01%
1Y
45.60%
3Y*
40.76%
5Y*
21.90%
10Y*
20.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLGAX
MainStay WMC Growth Fund
-0.58%16.60%25.22%38.63%-33.53%17.85%31.88%29.41%-4.33%30.05%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.18%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KLGAX and CHASX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2006

0.90

The correlation between KLGAX and CHASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLGAX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLGAX
KLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLGAXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

4.63

-4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

19.09

-17.01

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLGAX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLGAX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLGAX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLGAXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-45.94%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-9.90%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

-23.40%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-24.63%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.29%

-30.40%

-8.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-2.10%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-9.14%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

2.40%

+2.40%

Volatility

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLGAXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.84%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

14.28%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

18.32%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.67%

20.38%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

19.95%

+2.01%

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLGAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLGAX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

KLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than CHASX's 7.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.35%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
KLGAX
MainStay WMC Growth Fund
3.40%3.38%3.96%0.00%0.00%26.57%3.69%3.43%11.10%3.85%8.73%7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLGAX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to KLGAX (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLGAX dropped -55.04% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLGAX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer