KLAG vs. BIB
KLAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF) and BIB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both Leveraged Equities funds - KLAG tracks the KLA Corporation (KLAC) while BIB tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIB.
Performance
KLAG vs. BIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAG achieves a 161.64% return, which is significantly higher than BIB's 29.02% return.
KLAG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -25.65%
- 6M
- 100.02%
- YTD
- 161.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIB
- 1D
- -5.13%
- 1M
- 24.53%
- 6M
- 24.58%
- YTD
- 29.02%
- 1Y
- 108.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
KLAG vs. BIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 161.64% | -0.75% |
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 29.02% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAG and BIB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAG vs. BIB — Risk / Return Rank
KLAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIB
KLAG vs. BIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF (KLAG) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLAG | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLAG vs. BIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAG drawdown since its inception was -51.10%, smaller than the maximum BIB drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAG and BIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAG | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.10% | -67.24% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -65.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.52% | -6.30% | -38.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -32.63% | +16.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.54% | — |
Volatility
KLAG vs. BIB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAG | BIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.88% | 40.96% | +95.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.88% | 43.77% | +93.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.88% | 46.33% | +90.55% |
KLAG vs. BIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BIB's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLAG vs. BIB - Dividend Comparison
KLAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 0.31% | 0.77% | 1.69% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAG and BIB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIB.
BIB has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for KLAG.
KLAG tracks KLA Corporation (KLAC), while BIB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KLAG and 0.95% for BIB.
Find the right allocation for KLAG and BIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer