PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJUL vs. NAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KJUL vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KJUL vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KJUL
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July
1.40%7.70%8.69%11.78%-8.44%2.51%11.61%
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
2.50%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%3.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 2.50% return.


KJUL

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
1.40%
6M
3.66%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*

NAPR

1D
0.77%
1M
1.42%
YTD
2.50%
6M
4.41%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KJUL vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KJUL and NAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

KJUL vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL
KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KJULNAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.54

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.48

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.53

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.04

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.52

14.98

-5.46

KJUL vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and NAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KJULNAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.54

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.96

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and NAPR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KJUL vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUL nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, roughly equal to the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and NAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KJULNAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-16.53%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-7.53%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-16.53%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-2.34%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.03%

+0.54%

Volatility

KJUL vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 0.95%. This indicates that KJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KJULNAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

0.95%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.93%

2.35%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

9.68%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.28%

11.30%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.82%

10.71%

+1.11%