KJUL vs. LOUP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KJUL returned 5.01%/yr vs 11.19%/yr for LOUP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

KJUL vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 21.99% return.

KJUL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 6.94%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: 11.12%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: —

LOUP

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 21.99%
• 6M: 19.67%
• 1Y: 61.21%
• 3Y*: 34.83%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUL vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.94%	7.70%	8.69%	11.78%	-8.44%	2.51%	10.84%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	21.99%	43.24%	21.80%	51.31%	-46.00%	7.54%	61.45%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and LOUP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.70

The correlation between KJUL and LOUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KJUL vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KJUL	LOUP
Technology	19.1%	45.6%
Industrials	17.9%	17.6%
Healthcare	16.2%	2.6%
Financial Services	15.5%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	8.9%
Real Estate	5.9%	-
Energy	5.5%	2.7%
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Utilities	2.8%	3.0%
Communication Services	2.4%	17.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	-

Return for Risk

KJUL vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 88
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 60
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KJUL	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.06	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.58	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.33	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	2.93	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.98	9.65	+11.33

KJUL vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUL	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-58.68%	+41.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-21.00%	+17.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	-35.23%	+20.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	-55.63%	+38.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.64%	+6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-19.94%	+15.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	6.36%	-5.48%

Volatility

KJUL vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 0.40%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KJUL	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	12.01%	-11.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	23.40%	-18.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.75%	29.92%	-22.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.31%	32.66%	-20.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.62%	32.05%	-20.43%

KJUL vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJUL vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUL nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUL and LOUP in my portfolio?

KJUL and LOUP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KJUL or LOUP?

LOUP has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to KJUL (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

Which ETF is better, KJUL or LOUP?

On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 11.19% vs 5.01% for KJUL. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KJUL or LOUP?

Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUL or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUL or LOUP?

KJUL and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJUL and LOUP?

KJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 0.70% for LOUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.