KJUL vs. BUFF
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF).
KJUL and BUFF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KJUL is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. BUFF is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2016. Both KJUL and BUFF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KJUL vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KJUL vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July | 1.40% | 7.70% | 8.69% | 11.78% | -8.44% | 2.51% | 11.61% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | -0.54% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | 10.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's -0.54% return.
KJUL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KJUL vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KJUL vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
KJUL
BUFF
KJUL vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KJUL | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.86 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.74 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 9.81 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJUL | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.93 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between KJUL and BUFF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KJUL vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJUL nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Drawdowns
KJUL vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and BUFF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJUL | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -46.23% | +29.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -7.15% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.69% | -10.24% | -6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.82% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -6.29% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.27% | +0.30% |
Volatility
KJUL vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 2.63%. This indicates that KJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KJUL | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.63% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.93% | 4.06% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.45% | 9.82% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.28% | 8.40% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 17.82% | -6.00% |