PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJAN vs. ZOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJAN achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than ZOCT's -0.15% return.


KJAN

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
1.03%
6M
3.54%
1Y
16.76%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*

ZOCT

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.66%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KJAN vs. ZOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KJAN and ZOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

KJAN vs. ZOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJAN
KJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KJANZOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

2.03

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

2.99

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.43

-1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.28

15.10

-6.82

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ZOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJAN and ZOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KJANZOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.03

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.44

-0.96

Correlation

The correlation between KJAN and ZOCT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJAN nor ZOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJAN drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than ZOCT's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJAN and ZOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KJANZOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-3.18%

-25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-1.91%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-0.77%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-0.37%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.43%

+1.63%

Volatility

KJAN vs. ZOCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) at 1.07%. This indicates that KJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KJANZOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

1.07%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

1.70%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

3.20%

+10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

3.14%

+9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

3.14%

+12.45%