KJAN vs. PMMY
KJAN (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January) and PMMY (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May) are both Defined Outcome funds. KJAN is passively managed, while PMMY is actively managed. Over the past year, KJAN returned 21.94% vs 5.98% for PMMY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMMY.
Performance
KJAN vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJAN achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.19% return.
KJAN
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- —
PMMY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJAN vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJAN Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January | 8.07% | 17.04% |
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 2.19% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJAN and PMMY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between KJAN and PMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJAN vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank
KJAN
PMMY
KJAN vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KJAN | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 5.35 | -3.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 9.00 | -5.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.45 | -1.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 16.90 | -12.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 89.69 | -75.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJAN | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 5.35 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 4.56 | -4.01 |
Drawdowns
KJAN vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJAN drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJAN and PMMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJAN | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -0.36% | -28.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -0.36% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.04% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -0.04% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 0.07% | +1.47% |
Volatility
KJAN vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.36%. This indicates that KJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJAN | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 0.36% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.99% | 0.87% | +6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 1.12% | +9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 1.39% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 1.39% | +14.03% |
KJAN vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJAN vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJAN nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KJAN and PMMY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KJAN has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJAN dropped -28.94% vs PMMY's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, KJAN leads with 21.94% vs 5.98% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KJAN has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJAN.
KJAN and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJAN and 0.50% for PMMY.
PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KJAN and PMMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer