KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KITS.TO (Kits Eyecare Ltd.) and TMQ.TO (Trilogy Metals Inc.) are both stocks. KITS.TO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while TMQ.TO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, KITS.TO returned 12.31%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for TMQ.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KITS.TO achieves a -27.39% return, which is significantly lower than TMQ.TO's 3.70% return.

KITS.TO

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: -27.39%
• 6M: -13.91%
• 1Y: -6.86%
• 3Y*: 41.18%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: —

TMQ.TO

• 1D: -6.81%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 6M: -2.99%
• 1Y: 250.00%
• 3Y*: 107.45%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 24.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KITS.TO Kits Eyecare Ltd.	-27.39%	117.44%	35.10%	132.84%	-7.59%	-68.03%
TMQ.TO Trilogy Metals Inc.	3.70%	260.00%	184.48%	-20.55%	-65.57%	-18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between KITS.TO and TMQ.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap KITS.TO : CA$452.71M TMQ.TO : CA$1.06B
EPS KITS.TO : CA$0.10 TMQ.TO : -CA$0.27
PB Ratio KITS.TO : 6.48 TMQ.TO : 8.72
Total Revenue (TTM) KITS.TO : CA$213.33M TMQ.TO : CA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) KITS.TO : CA$77.95M TMQ.TO : CA$0.00
EBITDA (TTM) KITS.TO : CA$10.00M TMQ.TO : -CA$11.46M

Return for Risk

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KITS.TO

KITS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 35
KITS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
KITS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
KITS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
KITS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
KITS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TMQ.TO

TMQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
TMQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TMQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
TMQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
TMQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TMQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KITS.TO	TMQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.06	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	4.51	-4.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.57	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	3.62	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.32	5.37	-5.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KITS.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the TMQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KITS.TO and TMQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KITS.TO	TMQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	1.06	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.08	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.01	+0.14

Drawdowns

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KITS.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.07%, smaller than the maximum TMQ.TO drawdown of -95.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KITS.TO and TMQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KITS.TO	TMQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.07%	-95.35%	+17.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.57%	-69.59%	+19.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.57%	-69.59%	+19.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.40%	-85.83%	+11.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.31%	-58.10%	+18.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-68.50%	+31.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.22%	46.76%	-25.54%

Volatility

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ.TO) have volatilities of 21.66% and 21.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KITS.TO	TMQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.66%	21.33%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.99%	57.40%	-19.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.77%	236.89%	-190.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.65%	135.44%	-84.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.91%	106.21%	-56.30%

Dividends

KITS.TO vs. TMQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KITS.TO nor TMQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KITS.TO and TMQ.TO in my portfolio?

KITS.TO and TMQ.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.