KIQQ vs. LQTI
KIQQ (KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KIQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KIQQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.11K | $10.88K | $6.12K | |
| $2.40M | $2.20M | $1.68M |
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 2.94% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIQQ and LQTI is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIQQ vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
KIQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KIQQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -10.02%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIQQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -3.41% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -3.17% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -0.98% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIQQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 5.19% | +11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 5.90% | +11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 5.90% | +11.00% |
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
KIQQ vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than LQTI's 9.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 5.39% | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 8.54% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIQQ and LQTI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KIQQ.
LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 8.54%, compared with 5.39% for KIQQ.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for KIQQ and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer