KIQQ vs. FTQI
KIQQ (KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KIQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by KraneShares, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. KIQQ is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KIQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KIQQ
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 7.69% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIQQ and FTQI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIQQ vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
KIQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KIQQ | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIQQ | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -19.42% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.09% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -3.74% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIQQ | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 10.72% | +5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 14.83% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 13.28% | +2.75% |
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KIQQ vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than FTQI's 10.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.96% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF | 4.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIQQ and FTQI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KIQQ.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.96%, compared with 4.40% for KIQQ.
KIQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for KIQQ and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer