PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KIO vs. THQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KIO vs. THQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIO achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than THQ's 4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, KIO has underperformed THQ with an annualized return of 7.25%, while THQ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.


KIO

1D
-0.54%
1M
-2.04%
6M
1.34%
YTD
2.40%
1Y
-2.11%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
7.25%
ALL TIME*
5.88%

THQ

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.31%
6M
3.77%
YTD
4.81%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
9.22%
ALL TIME*
7.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.79M$2.44M$2.08M
$3.38M$4.74M$3.75M

KIO vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KIO
KKR Income Opportunities Fund
2.40%-2.49%18.45%31.53%-28.25%26.82%2.04%21.92%-2.53%9.68%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
4.81%13.88%15.51%-1.62%-17.53%33.39%15.20%22.70%3.41%21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between KIO and THQ is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2014

0.35

The correlation between KIO and THQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KIO vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KIO
KIO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KIO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KIO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

THQ
THQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
THQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
THQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
THQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
THQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KIO vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KIOTHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.29

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.74

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

5.95

-6.39

KIO vs. THQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the THQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIO and THQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KIO vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIO drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than THQ's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIO and THQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KIOTHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-39.35%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-16.74%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-25.86%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

-32.20%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.87%

-39.35%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-1.37%

-7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-8.54%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

4.90%

+0.25%

Volatility

KIO vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) is 2.61%, while Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that KIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KIOTHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

4.57%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

13.68%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

18.24%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

19.22%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

20.53%

-4.20%

KIO vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

KIO vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison

KIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, more than THQ's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KIO
KKR Income Opportunities Fund
13.24%12.58%10.90%11.32%11.44%7.45%10.12%9.51%10.53%9.66%9.92%10.81%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
11.53%11.29%11.09%7.45%6.81%5.27%6.62%7.08%8.05%7.71%8.70%9.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


KIO and THQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THQ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to KIO (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIO dropped -43.87% vs THQ's -39.35%.

THQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIO and THQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer