KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO).

KILO-B.TO and HGGG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018. HGGG.TO is a passively managed fund by Harvest that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Gold Giants Index TR. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	11.54%	56.51%	37.76%	10.43%	6.38%	-4.67%	21.17%	14.92%
HGGG.TO Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF	11.92%	170.60%	26.04%	4.17%	-4.68%	-14.34%	31.47%	25.92%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KILO-B.TO having a 11.54% return and HGGG.TO slightly higher at 11.92%.

KILO-B.TO

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -9.47%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 22.50%
• 1Y: 47.79%
• 3Y*: 35.04%
• 5Y*: 24.84%
• 10Y*: —

HGGG.TO

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: -16.08%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 29.96%
• 1Y: 130.52%
• 3Y*: 52.68%
• 5Y*: 31.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HGGG.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

HGGG.TO

Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF

KILO-B.TO

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KILO-B.TO

KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

HGGG.TO

HGGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
HGGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HGGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
HGGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HGGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HGGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KILO-B.TO	HGGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	3.00	-1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.18	-0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	4.14	-1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	15.30	-5.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the HGGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO-B.TO and HGGG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KILO-B.TO	HGGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	3.00	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.50	0.99	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.81	+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and HGGG.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KILO-B.TO nor HGGG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.00%
HGGG.TO Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.54%	2.65%	0.54%

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum HGGG.TO drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and HGGG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KILO-B.TO	HGGG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-51.54%	+29.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.41%	-31.16%	+13.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.41%	-39.14%	+21.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.47%	-16.08%	+6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-20.15%	+12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.96%	8.42%	-3.46%

Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) is 10.32%, while Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) has a volatility of 18.75%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KILO-B.TO	HGGG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.32%	18.75%	-8.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.01%	36.23%	-13.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.03%	43.82%	-17.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	31.99%	-15.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	32.39%	-14.41%