KIE vs. FBDC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KIE (SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KIE is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. Over the past year, KIE returned 12.81% vs -11.30% for FBDC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KIE charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.

Performance

KIE vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIE achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -4.10% return.

KIE

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 8.36%
• 6M: 8.66%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 1Y: 12.81%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 12.85%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

FBDC

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 4.48%
• 6M: -6.58%
• YTD: -4.10%
• 1Y: -11.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIE vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF	6.45%	2.48%
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-4.10%	-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between KIE and FBDC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

KIE vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KIE

KIE Risk / Return Rank: 26
KIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
KIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
KIE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
KIE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FBDC

FBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIE vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KIE	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	-0.63	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	-0.80	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.91	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	-0.55	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	-0.93	+3.65

KIE vs. FBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIE Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the FBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIE and FBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KIE vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIE and FBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KIE	FBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.30%	-20.60%	-54.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-20.60%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-12.29%	+10.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-10.74%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	12.23%	-7.51%

Volatility

KIE vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) at 4.45%. This indicates that KIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KIE	FBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.80%	4.45%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	14.59%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	18.06%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	17.86%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	17.86%	+3.31%

KIE vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KIE vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

KIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than FBDC's 11.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	11.99%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF	1.54%	1.57%	1.48%	1.45%	1.90%	1.95%	1.85%	1.76%	1.83%	1.56%	1.55%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KIE and FBDC in my portfolio?

KIE and FBDC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KIE or FBDC?

KIE has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to FBDC (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIE dropped -75.30% vs FBDC's -20.60%.

Which ETF is better, KIE or FBDC?

On 1-year performance, KIE leads with 12.81% vs -11.30% for FBDC. On fees, KIE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FBDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KIE or FBDC?

Over the 1-year period, KIE has performed better with a 12.81% return vs -11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KIE or FBDC?

KIE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KIE or FBDC?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.99%, compared with 1.54% for KIE.

What is the main difference between KIE and FBDC?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KIE and 1.35% for FBDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.