PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KF vs. DRMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KF vs. DRMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Korea Fund Inc (KF) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KF achieves a 52.92% return, which is significantly higher than DRMCX's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KF has underperformed DRMCX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while DRMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.


KF

1D
-2.46%
1M
-18.91%
6M
19.78%
YTD
52.92%
1Y
109.71%
3Y*
33.59%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
12.77%
ALL TIME*
7.03%

DRMCX

1D
2.34%
1M
-3.95%
6M
8.96%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
13.96%
ALL TIME*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.71M$1.51M$1.67M

KF vs. DRMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KF
The Korea Fund Inc
52.92%99.36%-19.29%12.34%-30.02%8.44%37.14%6.83%-19.26%42.50%
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
10.05%18.09%20.49%24.81%-32.59%14.91%55.27%41.73%-11.16%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KF and DRMCX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1996

0.49

The correlation between KF and DRMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (10 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KF vs. DRMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KF
KF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
KF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DRMCX
DRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KF vs. DRMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Korea Fund Inc (KF) and Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KFDRMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.09

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.65

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

2.13

+8.35

KF vs. DRMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the DRMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KF and DRMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KF vs. DRMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KF drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, which is greater than DRMCX's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KF and DRMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KFDRMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.25%

-67.97%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.19%

-13.75%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.19%

-26.83%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.83%

-43.47%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.91%

-43.47%

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.62%

-6.28%

-24.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-21.99%

-15.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

4.17%

+5.65%

Volatility

KF vs. DRMCX - Volatility Comparison

The Korea Fund Inc (KF) has a higher volatility of 18.84% compared to Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) at 5.35%. This indicates that KF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KFDRMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.84%

5.35%

+13.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.99%

16.35%

+30.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.38%

20.27%

+30.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.66%

24.24%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.58%

23.63%

+3.95%

KF vs. DRMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KF has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than DRMCX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

KF vs. DRMCX - Dividend Comparison

KF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than DRMCX's 15.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
15.02%16.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.44%9.02%4.12%14.34%8.78%7.35%5.65%
KF
The Korea Fund Inc
0.79%1.20%2.46%0.00%15.93%26.50%1.30%0.24%18.67%9.75%1.03%13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


KF and DRMCX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KF has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to DRMCX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KF dropped -85.25% vs DRMCX's -67.97%.

KF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KF and DRMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer