KF vs. CNWIX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KF (The Korea Fund Inc) and CNWIX (Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, KF returned 13.87%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for CNWIX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KF charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CNWIX.

Performance

KF vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Korea Fund Inc (KF) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KF achieves a 64.54% return, which is significantly higher than CNWIX's 31.88% return. Over the past 10 years, KF has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 13.87%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.

KF

• 1D: -5.01%
• 1M: -20.27%
• 6M: 44.49%
• YTD: 64.54%
• 1Y: 121.68%
• 3Y*: 37.50%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 13.87%

CNWIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -7.68%
• 6M: 21.61%
• YTD: 31.88%
• 1Y: 41.52%
• 3Y*: 22.12%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KF vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KF The Korea Fund Inc	64.54%	99.36%	-19.29%	12.34%	-30.02%	8.44%	37.14%	6.83%	-19.26%	42.50%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	31.88%	19.29%	14.99%	6.60%	-24.35%	-4.70%	54.23%	20.76%	-17.74%	36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between KF and CNWIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2008	0.69

The correlation between KF and CNWIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (5 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KF vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KF

KF Risk / Return Rank: 87
KF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
KF Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
KF Omega Ratio Rank: 80
KF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CNWIX

CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KF vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Korea Fund Inc (KF) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KF	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	1.46	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	1.89	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	2.55	+2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	7.85	+7.35

KF vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KF Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KF and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KF vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KF drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KF and CNWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KF	CNWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.25%	-43.57%	-41.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.42%	-16.28%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.04%	-19.34%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.83%	-36.91%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.91%	-43.57%	-9.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.35%	-13.14%	-12.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.81%	-16.37%	-21.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.03%	5.27%	+2.76%

Volatility

KF vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The Korea Fund Inc (KF) has a higher volatility of 20.87% compared to Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) at 13.77%. This indicates that KF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KF	CNWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.87%	13.77%	+7.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.17%	26.29%	+18.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.22%	28.41%	+19.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.00%	19.91%	+10.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.20%	24.98%	+2.22%

KF vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KF has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

KF vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

KF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than CNWIX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	0.05%	0.06%	0.00%	0.54%	0.97%	2.79%	2.01%	1.04%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	0.38%
KF The Korea Fund Inc	0.73%	1.20%	2.46%	0.00%	15.93%	26.50%	1.30%	0.24%	18.67%	9.75%	1.03%	13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KF and CNWIX in my portfolio?

KF and CNWIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KF or CNWIX?

KF has higher volatility (20.87%) compared to CNWIX (13.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KF dropped -85.25% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.