KEP vs. TLN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN).

Performance

KEP vs. TLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KEP vs. TLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation	-13.64%	139.83%	-4.05%	-3.33%
TLN Talen Energy Corporation	-14.84%	86.05%	214.80%	37.63%

Fundamentals

EPS KEP : $6.88K TLN : -$6.81
PS Ratio KEP : 0.00 TLN : 5.56
Total Revenue (TTM) KEP : $97.80T TLN : $1.85B
Gross Profit (TTM) KEP : $17.01T TLN : $638.00M
EBITDA (TTM) KEP : $25.89T TLN : $477.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEP achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly higher than TLN's -14.84% return.

KEP

• 1D: 4.63%
• 1M: -26.92%
• YTD: -13.64%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 92.31%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: -5.17%

TLN

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -13.95%
• YTD: -14.84%
• 6M: -24.95%
• 1Y: 59.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KEP vs. TLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEP

KEP Risk / Return Rank: 85
KEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
KEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
KEP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KEP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

TLN

TLN Risk / Return Rank: 75
TLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TLN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
TLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TLN Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEP vs. TLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEP	TLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.06	+0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.73	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.92	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	4.66	+3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEP vs. TLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the TLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEP and TLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEP	TLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.06	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	1.99	-1.99

Correlation

The correlation between KEP and TLN is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KEP vs. TLN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KEP nor TLN has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.68%	6.46%
TLN Talen Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KEP vs. TLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEP drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, which is greater than TLN's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEP and TLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEP	TLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.55%	-33.80%	-44.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.44%	-32.05%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.71%	-28.40%	-18.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-6.45%	-38.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.14%	13.24%	-2.10%

Volatility

KEP vs. TLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) is 15.26%, while Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that KEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEP	TLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	16.97%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.79%	39.74%	-1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.31%	56.55%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.50%	49.52%	-12.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.92%	49.52%	-14.60%

Financials