KEAT vs. ENDW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW).

KEAT and ENDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEAT is an actively managed fund by Keating. It was launched on Mar 27, 2024. ENDW is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Apr 9, 2025.

Performance

KEAT vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KEAT vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KEAT Keating Active ETF	12.12%	21.99%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	3.42%	30.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEAT achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than ENDW's 3.42% return.

KEAT

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 16.70%
• 1Y: 29.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENDW

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEAT vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEAT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.

KEAT

Keating Active ETF

ENDW

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

Return for Risk

KEAT vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 96
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEAT vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEAT	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.08	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEAT	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	3.24	-1.44

Correlation

The correlation between KEAT and ENDW is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KEAT vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison

KEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than ENDW's 2.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.37%	2.48%	1.72%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.34%	1.91%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KEAT vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEAT drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEAT and ENDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEAT	ENDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-6.44%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-4.36%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-0.82%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KEAT	ENDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	11.36%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.40%	11.36%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.40%	11.36%	-0.96%