KDEF vs. WDAF
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - KDEF tracks the The Korea Defence Industry Index while WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDAF.
Performance
KDEF vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than WDAF's 11.85% return.
KDEF
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -26.87%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 18.05%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDEF vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.06% | -5.14% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and WDAF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. WDAF — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
WDAF
KDEF vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KDEF | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KDEF | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | 0.15 | +1.76 |
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, which is greater than WDAF's maximum drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and WDAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.45% | -18.21% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.45% | -16.06% | -13.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -6.09% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | — | — |
Volatility
KDEF vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.63% | 32.10% | +12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 32.10% | +14.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 32.10% | +14.44% |
KDEF vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than WDAF's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.48% | 5.06% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and WDAF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.45% for WDAF.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and WDAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer