PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEF vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KDEF vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.


KDEF

1D
-2.40%
1M
-26.87%
YTD
6.06%
6M
18.05%
1Y
40.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEF vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
6.06%117.16%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%60.40%

Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and SHLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.52

The correlation between KDEF and SHLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

KDEF vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KDEF
SHLD

Industrials

84.9%
88.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%

-

Technology

3.1%
11.8%

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

KDEF
84.9%
SHLD
88.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KDEF
5.8%
SHLD

-

Technology

KDEF
3.1%
SHLD
11.8%

Healthcare

KDEF
2.4%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Communication Services

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Energy

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Real Estate

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Utilities

KDEF

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEF vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KDEFSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.49

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

1.30

+2.85

KDEF vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KDEFSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.41

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

2.00

-0.10

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDEFSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.45%

-20.10%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.45%

-20.10%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.45%

-18.85%

-10.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-3.19%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.69%

7.51%

+2.18%

Volatility

KDEF vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 7.81%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDEFSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.76%

7.81%

+7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.50%

19.35%

+17.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.63%

24.05%

+20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.54%

21.13%

+25.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.54%

21.13%

+25.41%

KDEF vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KDEF vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
6.48%5.06%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


KDEF and SHLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDEF has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to SHLD (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -29.45% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, KDEF leads with 40.06% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KDEF has performed better with a 40.06% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.

KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.50% for SHLD.

KDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDEF and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer