KDEF vs. SHLD
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - KDEF tracks the The Korea Defence Industry Index while SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned 40.06% vs 9.71% for SHLD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
KDEF vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.
KDEF
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -26.87%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 18.05%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDEF vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.06% | 117.16% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.28% | 60.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and SHLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between KDEF and SHLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
KDEF vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KDEF
SHLD
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KDEF
SHLD
Consumer Cyclical
KDEF
SHLD
-
Technology
KDEF
SHLD
Healthcare
KDEF
SHLD
-
Basic Materials
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Communication Services
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Consumer Defensive
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Energy
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Financial Services
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Real Estate
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Utilities
KDEF
-
SHLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
SHLD
KDEF vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KDEF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.49 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 1.30 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KDEF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.41 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | 2.00 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.45% | -20.10% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | -20.10% | -9.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.45% | -18.85% | -10.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -3.19% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | 7.51% | +2.18% |
Volatility
KDEF vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 7.81%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 7.81% | +7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.50% | 19.35% | +17.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.63% | 24.05% | +20.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 21.13% | +25.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 21.13% | +25.41% |
KDEF vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.48% | 5.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and SHLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KDEF has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to SHLD (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -29.45% vs SHLD's -20.10%.
On 1-year performance, KDEF leads with 40.06% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KDEF has performed better with a 40.06% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.
KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.50% for SHLD.
KDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer