PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEF vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KDEF vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KDEF vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
20.17%117.16%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-6.48%49.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 20.17% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return.


KDEF

1D
2.65%
1M
-13.39%
YTD
20.17%
6M
11.40%
1Y
121.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
5.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-6.52%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
84.54%
5Y*
66.14%
10Y*
69.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEF vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KDEFNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

1.48

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.17

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

2.92

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.53

7.39

+8.14

KDEF vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KDEFNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

1.48

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.61

+2.29

Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and NVDA is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KDEF vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
4.21%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -22.51%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KDEFNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.51%

-89.72%

+67.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.51%

-20.21%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.37%

-15.76%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-36.40%

+30.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

7.99%

+0.09%

Volatility

KDEF vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.46%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KDEFNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.32%

10.46%

+8.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.05%

25.91%

+7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.92%

41.44%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.29%

51.74%

-6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.29%

49.85%

-4.56%