PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEF vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.85% return.


KDEF

1D
1.61%
1M
-9.85%
YTD
10.00%
6M
13.24%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
0.62%
1M
1.08%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.80%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and JEPQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.33

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KDEF
JEPQ

Industrials

84.9%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
11.8%

Technology

3.1%
58.9%

Healthcare

2.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

13.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Industrials

KDEF
84.9%
JEPQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KDEF
5.8%
JEPQ
11.8%

Technology

KDEF
3.1%
JEPQ
58.9%

Healthcare

KDEF
2.4%
JEPQ
3.9%

Basic Materials

KDEF

-

JEPQ
0.9%

Communication Services

KDEF

-

JEPQ
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

KDEF

-

JEPQ
6.0%

Energy

KDEF

-

JEPQ
0.3%

Financial Services

KDEF

-

JEPQ
0.3%

Real Estate

KDEF

-

JEPQ
0.2%

Utilities

KDEF

-

JEPQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEF vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KDEFJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.91

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

13.84

-11.36

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDEFJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-20.07%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.55%

-8.82%

-26.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.83%

-1.64%

-25.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-3.41%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.09%

1.85%

+9.24%

Volatility

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 4.98%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDEFJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.52%

4.98%

+13.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.55%

10.22%

+28.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.43%

12.61%

+33.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.55%

16.73%

+30.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.55%

16.73%

+30.82%

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KDEF vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.22%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
6.25%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KDEF and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDEF has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -35.55% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 26.60% vs 23.84% for KDEF. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 26.60% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 6.25% for KDEF.

KDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDEF and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer