KDEF vs. ARKX
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. KDEF is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned 40.06% vs 69.46% for ARKX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
KDEF vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than ARKX's 23.67% return.
KDEF
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -26.87%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 18.05%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 6M
- 28.83%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 36.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
KDEF vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.06% | 117.16% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 23.67% | 37.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and ARKX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.32 |
KDEF vs. ARKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KDEF
ARKX
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KDEF
ARKX
Consumer Cyclical
KDEF
ARKX
Technology
KDEF
ARKX
Healthcare
KDEF
ARKX
Basic Materials
KDEF
-
ARKX
Communication Services
KDEF
-
ARKX
Consumer Defensive
KDEF
-
ARKX
-
Energy
KDEF
-
ARKX
-
Financial Services
KDEF
-
ARKX
-
Real Estate
KDEF
-
ARKX
-
Utilities
KDEF
-
ARKX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
ARKX
KDEF vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.42 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 9.20 | -5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 2.15 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | 0.43 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.45% | -43.61% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | -20.42% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.45% | -5.03% | -24.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -19.99% | +13.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | 7.57% | +2.12% |
Volatility
KDEF vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) at 11.01%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 11.01% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.50% | 25.01% | +11.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.63% | 32.49% | +12.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 27.72% | +18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 27.42% | +19.12% |
KDEF vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, while ARKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.48% | 5.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and ARKX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KDEF has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to ARKX (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -29.45% vs ARKX's -43.61%.
On 1-year performance, ARKX leads with 69.46% vs 40.06% for KDEF. On fees, KDEF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ARKX has been the lower-risk option at 11.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKX has performed better with a 69.46% return vs 40.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KDEF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.00% for ARKX.
They also come from different issuers: PLUS and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.75% for ARKX.
ARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer