PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCTAX vs. DFSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS California Tax (KCTAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCTAX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KCTAX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.


KCTAX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.99%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.38%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.51%

DFSMX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.15%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCTAX
DWS California Tax
1.92%3.45%1.92%5.44%-12.10%1.93%3.78%8.99%0.22%5.16%
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
1.15%2.30%2.84%2.98%-0.36%-0.11%0.83%1.62%1.22%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between KCTAX and DFSMX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2002

0.36

The correlation between KCTAX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCTAX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCTAX
KCTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KCTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
KCTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSMX
DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS California Tax (KCTAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCTAXDFSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

4.46

-2.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

12.85

-10.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

76.73

-68.88

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCTAX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCTAX drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCTAX and DFSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCTAXDFSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-2.66%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-0.20%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.50%

-0.49%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-1.66%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.87%

-1.69%

-16.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-0.23%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.03%

+0.91%

Volatility

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

DWS California Tax (KCTAX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that KCTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCTAXDFSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.18%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

0.38%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

0.61%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

0.79%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

0.77%

+3.50%

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCTAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

KCTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than DFSMX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.35%2.08%2.80%1.94%0.63%0.19%0.83%1.22%1.11%0.95%0.94%0.95%
KCTAX
DWS California Tax
3.04%3.48%2.82%2.22%1.91%3.13%3.95%5.11%3.04%3.01%3.46%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCTAX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCTAX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to DFSMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCTAX dropped -17.87% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCTAX and DFSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer