KCTAX vs. DFSMX
KCTAX (DWS California Tax) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, KCTAX returned 1.51%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DFSMX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCTAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.
Performance
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCTAX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KCTAX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.
KCTAX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCTAX DWS California Tax | 1.92% | 3.45% | 1.92% | 5.44% | -12.10% | 1.93% | 3.78% | 8.99% | 0.22% | 5.16% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 1.15% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCTAX and DFSMX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2002 | 0.36 |
The correlation between KCTAX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCTAX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
KCTAX
DFSMX
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS California Tax (KCTAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCTAX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 4.46 | -2.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 12.85 | -10.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 76.73 | -68.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCTAX drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCTAX and DFSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCTAX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -2.66% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -0.20% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.50% | -0.49% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -1.66% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.87% | -1.69% | -16.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -0.23% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.03% | +0.91% |
Volatility
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
DWS California Tax (KCTAX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that KCTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCTAX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.18% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 0.38% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 0.61% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 0.79% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 0.77% | +3.50% |
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCTAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCTAX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
KCTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than DFSMX's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.35% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
KCTAX DWS California Tax | 3.04% | 3.48% | 2.82% | 2.22% | 1.91% | 3.13% | 3.95% | 5.11% | 3.04% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCTAX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KCTAX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to DFSMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCTAX dropped -17.87% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.
DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCTAX and DFSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer