PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCCA vs. KLXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCCA vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KCCA

1D
0.09%
1M
11.42%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
2.68%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
-2.39%
5Y*
10Y*

KLXY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCCA vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KCCA
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF
-1.01%-11.81%-16.05%7.35%
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
-0.86%13.69%-6.39%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between KCCA and KLXY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2023

0.01

KCCA vs. KLXY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCCA
KLXY

Financial Services

27.1%

-

Technology

16.2%

-

Industrials

15.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
73.2%

Energy

7.9%

-

Healthcare

7.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

7.3%

-

Utilities

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
21.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

KCCA
27.1%
KLXY

-

Technology

KCCA
16.2%
KLXY

-

Industrials

KCCA
15.3%
KLXY

-

Consumer Cyclical

KCCA
10.1%
KLXY
73.2%

Energy

KCCA
7.9%
KLXY

-

Healthcare

KCCA
7.6%
KLXY
4.9%

Communication Services

KCCA
7.3%
KLXY

-

Utilities

KCCA
4.5%
KLXY

-

Consumer Defensive

KCCA
4.1%
KLXY
21.8%

Basic Materials

KCCA

-

KLXY

-

Real Estate

KCCA

-

KLXY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCCA vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCCA
KCCA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
KCCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCCA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
KCCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCCA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

KLXY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCCA vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCCAKLXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

KCCA vs. KLXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCCAKLXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

Drawdowns

KCCA vs. KLXY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCCAKLXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.71%

Volatility

KCCA vs. KLXY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCCAKLXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

KCCA vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCCA has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCCA vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison

KCCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than KLXY's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
KCCA
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF
2.90%2.87%30.58%3.12%0.24%
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
0.85%0.84%0.74%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCCA and KLXY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KLXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KLXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for KCCA.

KCCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.85% for KLXY.

KCCA is categorized as Commodities, while KLXY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. KCCA tracks S&P Carbon Credit CCA Index, while KLXY tracks Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for KCCA and 0.69% for KLXY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCCA and KLXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer