KCAI vs. KLXY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KCAI (KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF) and KLXY (Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCAI is a China Equities fund tracking the Qi China Alpha Index, while KLXY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KLXY.

Performance

KCAI vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KCAI

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: 54.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLXY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCAI vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF	5.79%	53.29%	11.12%
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	-0.86%	13.69%	-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between KCAI and KLXY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024	0.27

The correlation between KCAI and KLXY shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KCAI vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCAI

KCAI Risk / Return Rank: 97
KCAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KCAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
KCAI Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KCAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KCAI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCAI vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KCAI	KLXY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.98	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KCAI	KLXY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KCAI	KLXY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KCAI	KLXY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	—	—

KCAI vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCAI vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison

KCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.48%, more than KLXY's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF	33.48%	35.42%	2.19%	0.00%
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.74%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCAI and KLXY in my portfolio?

KCAI and KLXY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KCAI or KLXY?

On fees, KLXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCAI or KLXY?

KLXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KCAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCAI or KLXY?

KCAI has the higher dividend yield at 33.48%, compared with 0.85% for KLXY.

What is the main difference between KCAI and KLXY?

KCAI is categorized as China Equities, while KLXY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. KCAI tracks Qi China Alpha Index, while KLXY tracks Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KCAI and 0.69% for KLXY.