PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAUFX vs. MXMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) and Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUFX achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than MXMGX's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, KAUFX has outperformed MXMGX with an annualized return of 11.71%, while MXMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.


KAUFX

1D
2.27%
1M
-0.79%
6M
14.96%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
11.76%

MXMGX

1D
1.98%
1M
0.95%
6M
5.21%
YTD
5.45%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
8.98%
ALL TIME*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KAUFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd
12.10%12.18%29.84%14.88%-30.30%2.46%28.54%32.56%4.03%27.65%
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
5.45%2.99%9.02%19.61%-22.82%15.25%23.65%31.28%-2.80%23.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KAUFX and MXMGX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between KAUFX and MXMGX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAUFX vs. MXMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAUFX
KAUFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KAUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
KAUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMGX
MXMGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MXMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) and Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KAUFXMXMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.65

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

2.15

+1.04

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the MXMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUFX and MXMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUFX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum MXMGX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUFX and MXMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KAUFXMXMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-60.97%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.83%

-10.29%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-23.17%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

-32.33%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-35.88%

-4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-11.74%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

3.09%

+1.02%

Volatility

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) at 3.51%. This indicates that KAUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KAUFXMXMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

3.51%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.22%

10.71%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

13.75%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

19.08%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

18.91%

+2.03%

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAUFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMGX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAUFX vs. MXMGX - Dividend Comparison

KAUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than MXMGX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KAUFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd
9.60%10.76%22.39%1.89%0.00%9.77%6.94%11.75%15.74%11.76%10.48%16.34%
MXMGX
Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.59%1.68%3.66%2.39%2.66%4.92%2.74%2.19%6.13%4.53%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAUFX and MXMGX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KAUFX has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to MXMGX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUFX dropped -54.66% vs MXMGX's -60.97%.

KAUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAUFX and MXMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer