KARP.L vs. MCTS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KARP.L (KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD) and MCTS.L (Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Waystone Management and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KARP.L returned 2.82%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for MCTS.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KARP.L charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MCTS.L.

Performance

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) and Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

KARP.L is traded in GBP, while MCTS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MCTS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARP.L achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than MCTS.L's 3.32% return.

KARP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 15.05%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 68.60%
• 3Y*: 2.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCTS.L

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 9.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
KARP.L KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD	15.05%	33.35%	-17.39%	-12.26%	-21.62%
MCTS.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc	3.32%	23.52%	22.51%	-23.51%	-15.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KARP.L and MCTS.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022	0.68

The correlation between KARP.L and MCTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KARP.L

KARP.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
KARP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
KARP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
KARP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
KARP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KARP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

MCTS.L

MCTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
MCTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MCTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MCTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MCTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MCTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) and Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KARP.L	MCTS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	0.47	+2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	1.09	+2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.20	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.27	0.62	+6.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.63	0.95	+19.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARP.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the MCTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARP.L and MCTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KARP.L	MCTS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	0.47	+2.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.10	-0.04

Drawdowns

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, smaller than the maximum MCTS.L drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARP.L and MCTS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KARP.L	MCTS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-59.88%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-35.37%	+25.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.94%	-35.37%	-11.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.90%	-27.55%	+7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.89%	-36.23%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	23.06%	-19.62%

Volatility

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) is 0.00%, while Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCTS.L) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that KARP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KARP.L	MCTS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	8.33%	-8.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	14.91%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.92%	46.61%	-24.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.63%	44.15%	-19.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.63%	44.15%	-19.52%

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARP.L has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MCTS.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

KARP.L vs. MCTS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KARP.L nor MCTS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KARP.L and MCTS.L in my portfolio?

KARP.L and MCTS.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KARP.L or MCTS.L?

On fees, MCTS.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KARP.L or MCTS.L?

MCTS.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARP.L.

What is the main difference between KARP.L and MCTS.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Waystone Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARP.L and 0.49% for MCTS.L.